-
Shneor, Rotem
(2024).
Introduction to Crowdfunding and Hands-On Advice.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2024).
Introduction to Crowdfunding and Hands-On Advice.
-
Rykkja, Anders; Shneor, Rotem; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Dalla Chiesa, Carolina & Schlott, F.
(2023).
How productive are Patreon creators? A view of incentives at the margins.
-
Mæhle, Natalia; Shneor, Rotem; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Nordgård, Daniel; Bonet, Lluis & Lazarro, Elisabetta
(2023).
Round table: Crowdfunding Cultural Industries - the CROWDCUL project.
-
Mæhle, Natalia; Shneor, Rotem; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Nordgård, Daniel; Bonet, Lluis & Lazarro, Elisabetta
(2023).
Round table: Crowdfunding Cultural Industries - the CROWDCUL project.
-
Ezzahid, Hibbat-Allah; Shneor, Rotem & Meghouar, Hicham
(2023).
What Drives the Use of Crowdfunding by Micro-Entrepreneurs in Morocco? - Exploring Fundraiser Motives and Characteristics.
-
Arshad, Nadia; Shneor, Rotem & Berndt, Adele
(2023).
The Reward Crowdfunding Campaign Management Process: An Engagement Perspective.
-
Zhu, Fengya; Shneor, Rotem; Zhang, Bryan & Xie, Zhifu
(2023).
Drivers of peer-to-peer consumer lending amounts: evidence from the Philippines.
-
Berliner, Daniel; Shneor, Rotem & Wald, Andreas Erich
(2023).
Do Serial, Occasional and One-Time Equity Crowdfunding Investors Differ in Their Decision-Making Criteria?
-
-
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2022).
Introduction to Crowdfunding - November 2022.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2022).
Entrepreneurial Finance: Planning, Sources, and Crowdfunding.
-
Bonet, Lluis; Rykkja, Anders; Munim, Ziaul Haque & Shneor, Rotem
(2022).
Institutional Crowdfunding: A Research Proposal for Museet Midt, Norway.
-
Shneor, Rotem; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Mæhle, Natalia; Demattos Guimaraes, Alice & Dalla Chiesa, Carolina
(2022).
Crowdfunding Adoption by Artists: A comparative analysis of Norway and Brazil.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2022).
Crowdfunding: Opportunities for venture financing by the crowd.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2022).
Digital Lending and Digital Capital Raising.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2022).
Introduction to Streetlight Issues in Crowdfunding Research: Reflections, Directions, and Provocations.
-
Efrat, Kalanit; Gilboa, Shaked; Shneor, Rotem & Wald, Andreas Erich
(2022).
What drives serial backers in crowdfunding? An empirical test of competing theories.
-
Shneor, Rotem; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Mæhle, Natalia; Rykkja, Anders; Guimaraes, Alice Demattos & Dalla Chiesa, Carolina
(2022).
Crowdfunding Adoption by Artists: A comparative analysis of Norway and Brazil.
-
Baah-Peprah, Prince; Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2022).
The Roles of Community Identification and Trust in Crowdfunding Information-Sharing Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors.
-
Baah-Peprah, Prince; Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2022).
Explaining Reward Crowdfunding Backers’ Intentions and Behavior.
-
Shneor, Rotem; Rykkja, Anders; Mæhle, Natalia & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2021).
Drivers of Norwegian Artists' Use of Crowdfunding for Financing their Projects.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2021).
Crowdfunding and Sustainability.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2021).
Tyr til folkefinansiering for å utvikle bedriften.
[Newspaper].
lister24.no.
-
Shneor, Rotem; Rykkja, Anders; Mæhle, Natalia & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2021).
Drivers of Norwegian Artists' Use of Crowdfunding for Financing their Projects.
-
Shneor, Rotem; Rykkja, Anders; Mæhle, Natalia & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2021).
Crowdfunding Cultural Production: Determinants of Crowdfunding Adoption by Artists.
-
-
-
Berliner, Daniel; Wald, Andreas Erich & Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Financing Entrepreneurship: A Review of Equity Investors’ Decision-Making Criteria.
-
Shneor, Rotem & Wald, Andreas Erich
(2020).
Financing Entrepreneurship - A Review of Equity Investors’ Decision-Making Criteria.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
The State of Global Alternative Finance: Opportunities and Challenges in Sri Lanka and the World.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Introduction to Crowdfunding for Art Students.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Crowdfunding as Alternative Finance: Models, Trends, Challenges and Opportunities.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Crowdfunding: Models, Trends, Challenges and Opportunities.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Crowdfunding: Modeller, Trender, Utfordringer og Muligheter.
-
Serwaah, Priscilla; Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2020).
A gendered-based model of crowdfunding intentions.
-
Ziegler, Tania; Shneor, Rotem & Wenzlaff, Karsten
(2020).
Global Fintech Benchmarking and COVID-19s Impact.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Crowdfunding: Revolutionizing entrepreneurial finance before, during, and after COVID-19 - implications for South Africa.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
Introduction to Crowdfunding: Models, Opportunities and Guidelines.
-
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2020).
EU mykner opp reglene for folkefinansiering.
[Internet].
e24.no.
-
Rykkja, Anders; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Mæhle, Natalia & Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Cultural Crowdfunding - What do we know?
Show summary
Cultural fan funding, particularly in the music and audiovisual sector, were precursors to the instituted models of crowdfunding known to us today. Bands (Marillion, Radiohead, and Nine Inch Nails) and film producers (John Cassavetes, Mark Tapio Kines) managed to raise funding for artistic endeavours by reaching out to their fans. ArtistShare, a pioneer crowdfunding platform, was an attempt to facilitate and streamline such practices. However, there exists no systematic effort to classify, analyse and review the literature on crowdfunding usage and practices within the culture and arts sector — CCF. Thus, we conduct a systematic literature review (Cooper 1988, 1985) of CCF studies incorporating bibliometric analysis (Zupic and Čater 2015) of over 100 articles and book chapters. We address the question of why we crowdfund culture and what consequences crowdfunding practice has on cultural productions. Models of artistic and industrial categorisation are used to classify the existing literature. The bibliometric analysis reveals the intellectual structure of the research stream as a synthesis of what we know to assess further investigations.
Furthermore, we position crowdfunding within the context of traditional models of financing creative arts highlighting its position as a supplemental source of funding. After that, we look at the current market situation, pointing out prevalent types of crowdfunding, discussing different types of responses and the value created by and for the participants. Finally, we propose a conceptual framework for future CCF research. As such, in addition to academic relevance, our study offers implications for key stakeholders involved in CCF.
-
Rykkja, Anders; Munim, Ziaul Haque; Mæhle, Natalia & Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Cultural Crowdfunding - What do we know?
Show summary
Cultural fan funding, particularly in the music and audiovisual sector, were precursors to the instituted models of crowdfunding known to us today. Bands (Marillion, Radiohead, and Nine Inch Nails) and film producers (John Cassavetes, Mark Tapio Kines) managed to raise funding for artistic endeavours by reaching out to their fans. ArtistShare, a pioneer crowdfunding platform, was an attempt to facilitate and streamline such practices. However, there exists no systematic effort to classify, analyse and review the literature on crowdfunding usage and practices within the culture and arts sector — CCF. Thus, we conduct a systematic literature review (Cooper 1988, 1985) of CCF studies incorporating bibliometric analysis (Zupic and Čater 2015)of over 100 articles and book chapters. We address the question of why we crowdfund culture and what consequences crowdfunding practice has on cultural productions. Models of artistic and industrial categorisation are used to classify the existing literature. The bibliometric analysis reveals the intellectual structure of the research stream as a synthesis of what we know to assess further investigations.
Furthermore, we position crowdfunding within the context of traditional models of financing creative arts highlighting its position as a supplemental source of funding. After that, we look at the current market situation, pointing out prevalent types of crowdfunding, discussing different types of responses and the value created by and for the participants. Finally, we propose a conceptual framework for future CCF research. As such, in addition to academic relevance, our study offers implications for key stakeholders involved in CCF.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Crowdfunding: Models, Opportunities, and Guidelines.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
The Global Landscape of Online Alternative Finance.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Crowdfunding Models, Opportunities and Guidelines.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Donasjon crowdfunding i Norge og i Verden.
[Radio].
NRK Radio - Her og nå.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Global Status of Crowdfunding: Trends and Opportunities.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
Crowdfunding: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
The Status of Global Crowdfunding.
-
-
Ziegler, Tania & Shneor, Rotem
(2019).
The Global State of Crowdfunding: How Regions are Developing in Alternative Finance.
-
-
-
Øyna, Stine & Shneor, Rotem
(2018).
The Evolution of Born Globals: International Developmental Orientation.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2018).
The Nordic Crowdfunding Industry - Leaders or Laggards? Ànd What Next.
-
-
Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque
(2018).
Reward Crowdfunding as Planned Behavior.
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2018).
What is Crowdfunding? - Trends, Opportunities and Challanges in Africa and Globally.
-
-
Shneor, Rotem
(2018).
Crowdfunding in Norway: Current Status, Trends and Challenges.
-
Shneor, Rotem; Wenzlaff, Karsten; Boyko, Konstantin; Baah-Peprah, Prince; Odorovic, Ana & Okhrimenko, Olga
(2024).
European Crowdfunding Market Report 2023.
Universitetet i Agder - Crowdfunding Forskning Senter.
ISSN 978-82-693153-2-5.
Full text in Research Archive
-
-
Ziegler, Tania; Shneor, Rotem; Wenzlaff, Karsten; Britney, Wang; Kim, Jaesik & Odorovic, Ana
[Show all 14 contributors for this article]
(2020).
The Global Alternative Finance Market Benchmarking Report.
Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.
Show summary
For the first time, the CCAF has consolidated its annual regional reports to produce one global benchmarking report, with the intention of presenting world-wide online alternative finance data for 2018.This report presents the key findings from the CCAF annual global survey of online alternative finance. In all, 1,227 unique firms contributed to this study, providing 2,322 firm-level observations globally. Investigating in crowdfunding, P2P/marketplace lending or related capital raising activities, the study shows that 47 per cent of the firms were operating in two or more countries or jurisdictions.
Highlights from the report:
1. In 2018, the global alternative finance industry facilitated USD $304.5 billion in transaction volume. This global alternative finance volume is representative of funds that were raised via an online alternative finance platform for consumers, business and other fundraisers. This volume represents a 27 per cent annual decline against the $419 billion recorded in 2017. However, this drop in global volume stems primarily from a sharp decline in alternative finance activities in China. Excluding the Chinese market, the global alternative finance market volume actually grew by 48 per cent year-on-year, from the $60 billion in 2017 to $89 billion In 2018.
2. China had the largest alternative finance volume by country, having generated a total of $215.37 billion in 2018. The United States ($61 billion) and the United Kingdom ($10.4 billion) came in second and third respectively. In 2018, five additional countries surpassed the $1 billion threshold of alternative finance market volume including the Netherlands ($1.8 billion), Indonesia ($1.45 billion), Germany ($1.27 billion), Australia ($1.16 billion) and Japan ($1.07 billion).
3. In 2018, online alternative business funding for start-ups and SMEs accounted for $82 billion, which fell by almost half from the high of $153 billion recorded in 2017. Much like the global total market volume, this significant reduction in alternative business funding was largely due to the sharp decline in business focused funding activity in China. Excluding China, global business funding through alternative channels increased from the $21 billion in 2017 to $31 billion in 2018. This represented a 47 per cent annual increase against the previous year.
4. Approximately $162 billion of alternative finance volumes directly stem from funding provided by institutional investors such as banks, pension funds, mutual funds and family offices. With the involvement of institutional investors on the rise, most regions were fairly equally split, with roughly 50 per cent of funding coming from the institutions and rest provided by retail investors.
-
Ziegler, Tania; Shneor, Rotem; Wenzlaff, Karsten; Ana, Odorovic; Johanson, Deniel & Hao, Rui
[Show all 7 contributors for this article]
(2019).
Shifting Paradigms: The 4th Annual European Alternative Finance Report.
Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.