The University Board
The University Board has overall responsibility for quality work at the university and for developing the study programme portfolio as a whole. The board establishes and terminates study programmes of 30 credits or more. The board discusses the annual education – and research report and stipulates focus areas for next year’s report and the reports on quality from the Faculties and the Teacher Education Unit. Moreover, the Board decides on changes to the quality system and local regulations, as well as instructions and mandates for boards, committees and staff roles with responsibilities and tasks related to quality work.
The University Academic Affairs Committee
The committee supervises the quality of the study programmes on behalf of the University Board. The academic affairs committee accredits new study programmes and reaccredits study programmes on the basis of periodic evaluations. The academic affairs committee may also implement periodic evaluation based on risk assessment. Moreover, the academic affairs committee stipulates templates, checklists etc. for different parts of the quality system.
The University Research Committee
The research committee comments on issues relating to accreditation and reaccreditation of study programmes at the PhD level.
The University Learning Environment Committee
The Learning Environment Committee addresses and discusses issues that concern the students’ physical, psychosocial, organisational, digital and pedagogical learning environment.
The Faculty Board
The Faculty Board has overall responsibility for quality work at the faculty and development of the study programme portfolio. The Faculty Board establishes and terminates courses and externally financed study programmes of 30 credits and less. Also, the Faculty Board accredits and reaccredits freestanding courses and externally financed offers of study of 30 credits and less. Concerning the remaining study programmes, the Faculty Board adopts proposals for establishing and terminating programmes and adopts changes to programme descriptions. The Faculty Board stipulates the cycle of periodic programme evaluations and may also implement such evaluations based on risk assessments. The Faculty Board adopts the Faculty's annual quality report and may also delegate tasks to a study programme committee at the Faculty.
Teacher Education Board
The teacher education board has overall responsibility for quality work relating to the teacher education programmes and for developing the university’s teacher educations. The Board also adopts changes to study programmes and adopts the annual quality report. The teacher education board stipulates the cycle of periodic programme evaluations and may also implement such evaluations based on risk assessments.
Study programme committee/PhD programme committee
All study programmes which awards a degree upon completion, as well as the Post-Graduate Certificate in Education, must have a programme committee which contributes to the development of the study programme and the students’ total learning environment. Both the study programme committee and the PhD programme committee contribute with suggestions for the annual study programme report. Also, once per year, the PhD programme committee processes reports on progress from students and supervisors.
The Faculty may delegate tasks from the PhD programme committee to a specialisation committee.
The Faculties and the Teacher Education Unit will themselves organise additional arenas for quality work.
The lecturers’ meeting will discuss the results of the students’ evaluation of courses, practice and exchange in the study programme. The lecturers’ meeting will also give recommendations concerning possible changes to courses and study programmes. Lecturers’ meetings in the teacher education programmes are conducted both at the programme level and the course level. For PhD programmes the lecturers ́ meeting may be conducted on spesialisation level. The composition of the lecturers’ meeting for each offer of study is stipulated by the Faculty/Teacher Education Unit.
The managers’ meetings at the Faculties/Teacher Education Unit discuss the status of the study programme portfolio and measures like follow-up of programme reports and reports in the wake of periodic programme evaluations.
Rector
Rector has overall responsibility for quality work at the University of Agder.
Vice-Rector for education, programme quality and learning environment
The Vice-Rector for education, programme quality and learning environment chairs the university’s Academic Affairs Committee and has overall responsibility for quality work and for overseeing the quality of the study programmes.
Vice-Rector for research, dissemination and innovation The Vice-Rector for research, dissemination and innovation heads the university’s (central) research committee and has, jointly with the Vice-Rector for education, programme quality and learning environment, overall responsibility for quality work in study programmes at the PhD level.
Faculty Dean
The Faculty Dean manages the faculty’s quality work and ensures that this work is conducted in accordance with the university’s quality system. The Dean has overall responsibility for the link between the Faculty’s study programme portfolio and research activity and cooperation on teacher education. Also, the Dean has overall responsibility for the Faculty’s cooperation with external parties. In cooperation with the Faculty Director, the Dean has overall responsibility for personnel management and competence development as well as to ensure adequate study programme management for the Faculty’s offers of study. Also, the Dean has overall responsibility for the Faculty’s learning environment.
The Dean has overall responsibility for the development of the Faculty’s PhD programme and for other study programmes where the responsibility does not lie with a specific department. In relation to PhD programmes, the Dean is responsible for preparing a reply to the report from the periodic programme evaluation.
Dean of the Teacher Education Unit
The Dean of the Teacher Education Unit manages the unit’s quality work and ensures that it is carried
out in accordance with the university’s quality system. The Dean has overall responsibility for cooperation with the faculties and external parties concerning the content and organisation of the teacher education study programmes and the development of the total portfolio of the programmes. Also, the Dean has overall responsibility for the learning environment in the teacher education and a special responsibility for initiating research – and development work related to the teacher education study programmes.
Head of Department
The Head of Department manages the department’s quality work and ensures that it is carried out in accordance with the university’s quality system. The Head of Department is, in cooperation with study programme managers and PhD programme managers, responsible for developing the department’s courses and study programmes, and for facilitating discussions of quality work on different internal arenas. For offers of study up to, and including, the master’s level, the Head of Department is responsible for preparing a reply to the report from the periodic programme evaluation and the report from the expert committee in connection with the establishment of new study programmes.
In departments which contribute with courses to the teacher education programmes, the Head of Department is responsible for cooperation with current programme managers.
In cooperation with the Dean, the Head of Department is responsible for the department’s cooperation with external parties. Also, the Head of Department is responsible for the connection between the department’s study programme portfolio and research activities as well as for personnel management and competence development. The Head of Department has overall responsibility for the department’s learning environment.
Head of Study for the Teacher Education
Heads of Study for the teacher education are, in cooperation with Heads of Department, responsible for quality work being carried out in accordance with the university’s quality system. Heads of Study will also contribute to developing the learning environment and academic and pedagogical quality in the study programmes.
The Head of Study is also responsible for facilitating discussions of quality work in different arenas with current cooperation partners at the faculties and with students. In cooperation with the Dean of the Teacher Education Unit, the Head of Study is responsible for cooperation with external parties.
The Head of Study prepares the annual programme report and replies to the reports from the periodic programme evaluation and reports from the expert committee in cases where a new study programme is being established.
Study programme manager/PhD programme manager
The study programme manager/PhD programme manager manages quality work in connection with the study programme and ensures that it is carried out in accordance with the university’s quality system. The study programme manager/PhD programme manager will contribute to the development of the learning environment and the academic and pedagogical quality of the study programme.
In cooperation with the Head of Department, the study programme manager/PhD programme manager is responsible for facilitating discussions of the quality work in different arenas with lecturers, students and external cooperation partners.
The study programme manager/PhD programme manager chairs the lecturers’ meeting.
The study programme manager/PhD programme manager prepares the annual study programme report.
The University Board stipulates competence requirements for study programme /PhD programme managers.
The Faculty Board may delegate tasks from the PhD programme manager to the leader of the PhD specialisation.
Coordinator for teacher education subjects
Faculties that offer courses in the teacher education programmes must have subject coordinators who, in cooperation with the study programme manager, contributes to the development of the different teacher education programmes.
Person responsible for the course
The person responsible for the course is academically responsible for the course and is responsible for coordination of courses with multiple lecturers. The person responsible for the course is also responsible for conducting student evaluations and for follow-up of students and participation in lecturers’ meetings.
Supervisor for PhD students
The principal supervisor of PhD candidates must submit a supervisor report at least once a year.
Instructions/mandates have been prepared for the Academic Affairs Committee, The Central Research Committee, the Learning Environment Committee, the Faculty Board, the Teacher Education Board, the Study Programme Committee/the PhD programme Committee, Vice-Rector for education, programme quality and learning environment, Vice-Rector for research, dissemination and innovation, Dean, Head of Department, Head of Studies, Study programme Manager/PhD Programme Manager and persons responsible for courses.
The University Director has overall responsibility for quality work related to the university’s administrative services.
The Faculty Director is responsible for quality assurance and development of the faculty’s study administrative services. This responsibility includes ensuring that the faculty has the necessary competence to provide support to academic managers. Similarly, the Dean of the Teacher Education Unit is responsible for administrative services at the Teacher Education Unit. The Faculty Director/Dean of Teacher Education is responsible for preparing annually a report on quality work related to the unit’s administrative services.
The Faculty Director is responsible for appointing a student representative for the faculty’s PhD programme and possibly also a representative for each specialisation. In cooperation with the Student Organisation in Agder (STA), the Faculty Director/Dean of Teacher Education is responsible for the election of student representatives to all levels of all study programmes and possibly also for other relevant levels, as well as for all free-standing courses.
In cooperation with STA, the Faculty Director/Dean of Teacher Education is responsible for the training of student representatives in their role within the quality system.
The administrative managers of units in the university administration is responsible for development and quality assurance of study administrative services within their units. The administrative manager is also responsible for preparing the annual report on the unit’s quality work.
Employees and students are jointly responsible for quality work. The individual student is expected to take an active part in evaluations of courses and programmes in which they are enrolled. Student representatives have a special responsibility for student participation. Also, students are represented in boards and committees. In cooperation with the Faculty Director/Dean of Teacher Education, the Students Association is jointly responsible for the election of student representatives at all levels in all programmes and other relevant levels, as well as for all freestanding courses. STA is also jointly responsible for training student representatives for their role in the quality system.
At the PhD level, one representative is elected for each PhD programme, and possibly also for each specialisation.
PhD candidates are required to submit a report on progress at least once per year.
External participants from the Higher Education sector participate in connection with accreditation of bachelor, master and PhD programmes and in connection with periodic evaluations of the study programmes at the university.
External participants from working life and society participate in connection with periodic evaluations, in implementation and evaluation of practice and in connection with other kinds of students’ activities that are linked to working life
Responsible for this page: Turid Høgetveit <turid.hogetveitSPAMFILTER@uia.no (Remove SPAMFILTER from the address)>